New Vaccine Studies and Lawsuits

Only 19% Efficacy?

There is plenty of news on the Covid-19 front with many many legal actions underway, but results of two new studies on the so called vaccines is most noteworthy.

Remember, a judge forced the FDA to release the Pfizer/Moderna trial data over about 18 months instead of the 50 years the FDA wanted. A lot has been revealed and truths uncovered.

With considerably lower efficacy rates, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines caused more deaths than the number of lives they saved, according to a new peer-reviewed study, published in the journal Cureus on Jan. 24. The researchers called for a “global moratorium” on the shots and their “immediate removal” from the childhood immunization schedule. They analyzed reports from the initial phase 3 trials of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. These trials led to the shots being approved under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States.

Moreover, based on “conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections,” the study authors said.

Going back to 2020, Pfizer started the Phase 3 trial on July 27^th and concluded the trial on November 13, 2020 when all participants had received at least 2 doses. They began measuring 28 days after the 1^st dose so you can see the total trial length when they started testing for Covid-19 infection was about 2 and 1/2 months. Everyone was not given the shot the first day, so if you take an average the trial data was over a course of about 5 to 7 weeks. I was very critical that this was way too short a time period to test anything, let alone a vaccine that usually takes 5 years or more. You can go to Pfizer's web site and look at news releases of 2020 to confirm all these dates and numbers. Moderna followed a similar course.

Based on a data cut-off date of October 9, 2020, 37,706 participants had a median of at least two months of safety data available after dose 2 and contributed to the main safety dataset. I was also very critical that 2 months safety data was a joke. Furthermore they unblinded the placebo Group in December 2020, so there was and is no possible way to get any safety data beyond a few months.

Here is an important point before the next few paragraphs. I listened to an analyst conference call with Pfizer back in 2020 and one of the questions asked, was – what was the exposure rate to Covid-19 in the trials? After all in such a short time period, not many would get exposed to the virus. Kathrin Jansen, Ph.D., Senior VP and Head of Vaccine Research & Development, Pfizer said they estimated it to be 1 in 100. For round numbers that would mean about 440 out of 44,000 were exposed to the virus during the trials. Hardly enough for a good test and data in the trials.

Following the first trials of Pfizer and Moderna, it was claimed that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines had a 95 percent efficacy in the reduction of symptomatic COVID-19. Pfizer’s claim was based on the fact that only eight out of 22,000 vaccine recipients contracted COVID-19 during the trial compared to 162 out of 22,000 people in the placebo group. In total, 170 confirmed COVID-19 cases were reported in both groups.

However, the study researchers pointed out that a large number of infections fell under the “suspected” COVID-19 category, which was ignored. A total of 3,410 such suspected cases were identified in the trial, which is 20 times the 170 confirmed cases. What is suspected? Does it mean they had symptoms and not tested? If so, the trial quality was very very poor. Also, the 3,410 number seems more likely given that the fast spreading delta variant started in late 2020 and there was a big spike in cases in November/December 2020. For sure total cases were more than 170.

I would surmise the 3,410 is probably a more truthful number. “There were 1,594 such cases in the vaccinated group and 1,816 in the placebo. When factoring in both confirmed and suspected cases, vaccine efficacy against developing symptoms drops to only 19 percent, far below the 50 percent RR [relative risk] reduction threshold required for regulatory authorization,” the study said. If the number is only half correct - efficacy is still a low 38%.

Basically, we were lied to, all in the name of making huge profits and perhaps other motives. The Covid-19 plandemic was the greatest transfer of wealth in history.

This next study is based on the over 99 million people who got Covid-19 shots. The articles says these side effects are rare and use '?.? X' numbers so they appear small. Let's use the % that puts this in a better perspective, since specifically if you are 65 years or younger and in decent health, your chance of contracting and dying from Covid-10 is about 0.002%. I am going to use this graphic in the UK's Daily Mail on the risks of severe health conditions from the shots.

Keep in mind that these are not the mild side effects like headache, nausea and fatigue, but these are life altering and deadly side effects. If the odds of something are a fraction of a percent like dying from Covid-19, dying in a car accident or making a hole in one at golf, it matters little and is not relevant. Even if the odds increase 5% to 10% it is statistically insignificant. Say this percent was measured over a period of 12 months. The next 12 months could measure back to normal. However, once you get up to the 15% to 25% range it becomes significant. There is something going on or some cause. You may not be concerned if your odds of a heart attack increase 5%, but if it is 50%, that is huge.

Taking these Covid shots, your risks are increasing 100s of percent. If you take at least 1 shot or more. For example:

• Chance of brain/spinal cord swelling with 1 Moderna shot increases 378%;

• Chance of blood clots with AstraZeneca increases 323%;

• Chance of Myocarditis Pfizer 1^st shot increases 278%;

• Chance of Myocarditis Moderna 1^st shot increases 348%;

• Chance of Myocarditis Moderna after 2nd shot increases 610%.

You can go through the list for the other examples of risk, but these are huge increases. And this is with over 99 million people so a very broad spectrum. What is more important, it is the accumulative risk. You don't have to be concerned with just one of these but all of them, all combined your risk increases 1000s%. It is no wonder death and adverse event reporting in VAERS is through the roof.

Government and Public Health will continue to down play this and never admit their mistakes. Plus they are making scads of $$. Most of the public is well aware of the shots danger and ineffectiveness. There has been only about 5% uptake of the most recent shots in the U.S. so over 90% now know the scam. However, we need to be vigilant and refuse this mRNA in the future. Government and Big Pharma want to push this mRNA with other vaccines and drugs. The main reason is they are way cheaper to mass produce and can make much larger profits.

Don't be fooled with Climate Change either. There is absolutely zero evidence that carbon causes climate change. This is just another narrative to tax and transfer wealth to the governments and elites.

Lots of Cover up and Lawsuits Continues -Canada examples

A senior Health Canada official removed mention of a “high level of impurity” in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in an assessment done by a colleague for the department’s chief medical adviser, internal records show. The assessment was meant as a brief on recent findings about the creation of unintended proteins by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

“I am very wary of the 4th bullet on impurities that Dr. [Agnes] Klein had put in,” HC Senior Advisor Poovadan Anoop wrote in a Dec. 14, 2023, email referring to the internal HC assessment written by Dr. Agnes V. Klein, a senior medical advisor with HC. Mr. Anoop’s email was addressed to his superior, Sophie Sommerer, director general of Health Canada’s Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate (BRDD). The unit is responsible for approving vaccines. The Epoch Times obtained the internal records through the access to information system. Dr. Klein called it a “high level of impurity.”

An application for a class-action lawsuit has been filed in the Federal Court against Canada’s Attorney General over the ArriveCan app. If I hear this class action is accepted, I will let you know because anyone who travelled and was quarantined could be awarded. Opposition leader Mr. Poilievre told reporters that the RCMP needs to get to the bottom of the “ArriveScam” scandal which he said “went 750 times over budget. Here is another lawsuit -

Canadian manufacturers of masks and other equipment for protecting against COVID-19 are seeking more than $5 billion in damages from the federal government, saying Ottawa misled them about buying and helping sell their products. If you recall, the Trudeau government chose to get PE from China, ignoring Canadian sources. Another Trudeau scam not yet uncovered.

A year-long Global News investigation into federal procurement revealed that BTNX, a Toronto-area rapid-test supplier that buys the devices from China, deleted dozens of specimens, or samples, from a study it submitted to Health Canada in October 2020. Deleting the specimens increased the estimate of the rapid test’s reliability to detect the virus.

This highly unusual sudden health problems with athletes and pilots continues. Lufthansa Flight LH-1140 (FRA-SVQ) Frankfurt to Seville on Feb.17, 2024 , the First Officer was incapacitated, plane turned around back to Madrid this is the 2nd incident already in 2024. Pre Covid shots, cases like this only occurred once every several years.